Join the debate
Jump in the Crossfire by using #Crossfire on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram.
Jump in the Crossfire by using #Crossfire
on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram.
September 7th, 2013
01:02 PM ET
Would Bush be stronger on Syria?
Sen. Jeff Sessions says Bush would be stronger on Syria. CNN "Crossfire" hosts Newt Gingrich and Van Jones discuss.
|
|
Posted by Crossfire staff Filed under: Newt Gingrich • Syria • The Situation Room • Van Jones |
Meet the Hosts
Author, documentary filmmaker, historian, Speaker of the House (1995-1999), and 2012 Republican presidential candidate
Fmr. Obama Deputy Campaign Mgr. and W.H. Sr. Adviser, founder of Precision Strategies, fmr. Sr. Adviser to Maj. Leader Reid and Sen. Kennedy
Conservative columnist for New York Daily News, contributing editor at Townhall Magazine, commentator and author
Former Special Adviser for Green Jobs under President Obama, co-founder of Rebuild the Dream, author and attorney
Yes, President George W. Bush he would as in the past he was Commander in Chief , his cabinet, and his military advisers determined that the al Qaeda terrorist network had financed and perpetrated the September 11 attacks. They also determined that the Taliban, a group in control of the Afghanistan government, had permitted al Qaeda to operate and train its members within Afghanistan's borders. Thus, the President used military force to invade the country in an effort to destroy the al Qaeda network and topple the Taliban. Now Syria used chemical Sarin to harm their peoples. We do not know exact who did it ? but President George W. Bush had strong decision. Thanks CNN for question.
I think George W. Bush would attack the wrong country.