Join the debate

Jump in the Crossfire by using #Crossfire on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram.

Jump in the Crossfire by using #Crossfire
on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram.

September 7th, 2013
01:02 PM ET

Would Bush be stronger on Syria?

Sen. Jeff Sessions says Bush would be stronger on Syria. CNN "Crossfire" hosts Newt Gingrich and Van Jones discuss.

 Posted by
Filed under: Newt Gingrich • Syria • The Situation Room • Van Jones
soundoff (2 Responses)
  1. Loc Ta_Vietnamese Airborne

    Yes, President George W. Bush he would as in the past he was Commander in Chief , his cabinet, and his military advisers determined that the al Qaeda terrorist network had financed and perpetrated the September 11 attacks. They also determined that the Taliban, a group in control of the Afghanistan government, had permitted al Qaeda to operate and train its members within Afghanistan's borders. Thus, the President used military force to invade the country in an effort to destroy the al Qaeda network and topple the Taliban. Now Syria used chemical Sarin to harm their peoples. We do not know exact who did it ? but President George W. Bush had strong decision. Thanks CNN for question.

    September 8, 2013 at 12:33 pm | Reply
  2. George F. Zimmer

    I think George W. Bush would attack the wrong country.

    September 7, 2013 at 5:26 pm | Reply

Post a comment


  

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.
« Back to main