Crossfire | Weeknights @ 6:30 pm ET on CNN

Join the debate

Jump in the Crossfire by using #Crossfire on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram.

Jump in the Crossfire by using #Crossfire
on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram.

May 7th, 2014
09:48 PM ET

Nance: Hillary was the enabler-in-chief

Penny Young Nance says Hillary was the enabler-in-chief while debating the Lewinsky scandal with Ruth Marcus, Van Jones and S.E. Cupp.

Cupp: liberals are very 'cagey' over Hillary
S.E. Cupp challenged Ruth Marcus over what people are allowed to discuss when debating Hillary Clinton.

Jones outraged GOP fundraising off Benghazi
Van Jones is outraged that the GOP is fundraising off of the Benghazi tragedy.

Cupp: Hollywood's naive outrage
S.E. Cupp is outraged over Hollywood just boycotting The Beverly Hills Hotel.

soundoff (29 Responses)
  1. countingdown

    How much money has the democrats raised off blaming Bush for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars they vote for? Boo hoo!
    If they aren't hiding something then why are they hiding something?

    May 10, 2014 at 8:26 pm | Reply
    • Specifically

      Specifically, what do you think they are hiding?

      May 12, 2014 at 4:10 pm | Reply
      • countingdown

        Specifically, where was the president!
        Specifically, at point was it determined to be a spontaneous demonstration!
        Specifically, what were the determining factors to issue the statement!
        Specifically, who knew what, when, how!
        Specifically, what was done to aid our ambassador!
        Specifically, why the continued denial of a targeted attack by a know terrorist group!
        Specifically, why hide any part of it!
        Specifically, why didn't the president acknowledge the facts!
        Specifically, why wasn't there tighter security on a 9/11 anniversary!
        Specifically, why did Hillary make the what difference comment, when the lives of our ambassadors and their families all over the world need to know they will be protected!

        SPECIFICALLY, THIS IS JUST A FRACTION OF THE NEED TO KNOW ANSWERS!

        May 20, 2014 at 10:56 am |
  2. REGinAZ

    Rand Paul seems to have a knack for boldly “opening his mouth and sticking his foot into it”. His latest is seen in his statement that “Clinton is precluded from running for president”, which clearly shows his real fear and his feelings of inferiority for ever having to compete with her. Paul, and the GOP in general continually offer the people, the majority, absolutely nothing and just demonstrate that they think they can disgustingly manipulate public opinion by constantly presenting propaganda and their aggressive criticism. Currently they have simply taken Obamacare and Benghazi criticism to extremes, demonstrating they have nothing positive to offer and that they are desperate, ignoring that Obamacare is proving to offer value, while they neglected to even address the problems, and while their Benghazi criticism is being totally over played in their far reaching effort to just have something.

    That behavior is understandable when it is seen in their being literally owned and controlled by “the money”, that they have little choice as they are simply “puppets” needing to cater to serving “the money’s” interests, no matter what it costs the majority, and that they are then completely dependent on being able to con the people, with the power, influence and big bucks provided them, insultingly just taking the majority for granted. We saw this with Bush-Cheney as they used their offices and America’s resources for their private agenda to diligently serve only the few and it cost this country and the majority drastically, literally bringing America’s economy down while “the money” still gained and the GOP rationalized it all as being “conservative”. This is what they want to return to, “more of the same” Bush-Cheney style, which can only result in “more of the same”.

    All of politics, all parties, leave plenty of room for improvement but the reality is that the Republican / Tea party completely caters to “the money” for their strong support, support which comes with an abundance of strings being pulled and renders the GOP politicians to just be “puppets” dancing for the few and trying to con the many. It has been said that today’s GOP is literally incapable of honestly and responsibly governing for the people, for the majority, and since 2000 they have totally substantiated that to be true. To ever regain a “Grande Ole Party”, with a true conscience for the people, it is necessary for the voters to force change, neither the Supreme Court nor the politicians themselves will do it, in order to cut the stranglehold “the money” has on the party, by strongly refusing to be conned, by totally rejecting the constant barrage of propaganda and by voting to firmly and totally reject the “puppets” who perform only for “the money” and their own political ambitions. Otherwise the country needs to be ready for the possibility of “more of the same”, Bush-Cheney style.

    May 9, 2014 at 5:35 pm | Reply
  3. Mark

    According to Obama, I guess Benghazi should have been classified as workplace violence since Ambassador Steven was at work.
    Here's What difference it makes, Hilliary .... You have to identify the problem before you can solve it. Obama has never identified Islamic Terrorism as a problem. Obama is delusional with fond memories from his childhood in the Islamic culture.

    May 9, 2014 at 2:32 pm | Reply
    • Here's the answer

      ALL attacks on a US embassy are terrorist attacks. So were the attacks that happened MORE OFTEN and MORE DEADLY under Bush. IT'S A GIVEN!!!!!! Are the GOP just mad that we didn't start ANOTHER "unfunded/off-the-books" war? Maybe the GOP are just embarrassed that THEY cut funding for security. Witch hunt is the ANSWER.

      May 9, 2014 at 5:10 pm | Reply
  4. Mark

    Let me get this straight, Jones ,
    Informing the public about Obama's abuse of power within a political ad is somehow unethical, But misleading the American people about security issues at Benghazi is acceptable.

    May 9, 2014 at 1:09 pm | Reply
    • kurt

      If the SEVEN GOP investigations and reports on Benghazi haven't found anything that they can take action on against the White House... why do you think anything is there?

      Is the GOP just incompetent?

      May 9, 2014 at 3:00 pm | Reply
      • Mark

        That comment doesn't merit a response.

        May 9, 2014 at 5:14 pm |
      • countingdown

        So, what are you liberals afraid of? If there is nothing to hide why hide it? Let the select committee have all documents unedited, After all this was (meaning never has been since Obama was elected and actually the worst) the most transparent administration ever.

        May 11, 2014 at 8:57 am |
    • Here's the answer

      ALL attacks on a US embassy are terrorist attacks. So were the attacks that happened MORE OFTEN and MORE DEADLY under Bush. IT'S A GIVEN!!!!!! Are the GOP just mad that we didn't start ANOTHER "unfunded/off-the-books" war? Maybe the GOP are just embarrassed that THEY cut funding for security. Witch hunt is the ANSWER.

      May 9, 2014 at 5:06 pm | Reply
      • countingdown

        Not according to Hillary, Obama, the democrats, liberals and idiots. This one was a spontaneous demonstration based on a video.

        May 11, 2014 at 8:44 am |
      • So

        So. It was a spontaneous demonstration by terrorists. Your point is?

        May 12, 2014 at 9:28 am |
  5. jerry

    clinton hid files during Nixon's impeachment hearings when she worked for the kennedys. This woman is rotten to the core and should never have been near the White House. She and her husband need to retire to their 100 million dollar fortune accumulated while humbly serving the masses, the ignorant masses.

    May 9, 2014 at 10:18 am | Reply
    • And

      And the Bush family (via the CIA under the direction of Bush Sr.) had JFK murdered using EH Hunt as the hit man.

      May 9, 2014 at 11:48 am | Reply
  6. Do something constructive

    HeY SE Cupp. Do something constructive and draw us a picture of some cookies.

    May 9, 2014 at 9:32 am | Reply
  7. kurt

    1. Monica Lewinsky is not an injured party. It's not like she didn't know the president was married. It's not like she claims she was in any way presured into the relationship. She doesn't believe she was sexually harassed.

    2. The only injured party in this was Hillary. Why would it be reasonable for us to blame her in any way for her husband's actions? She was the victim of those actions. Why would we fault her in any way for going after women who slept with her husband? Her husband and Lewinsky were the offenders... she has every right to go after either one or both. There's nothing in feminism that says you have to forgive the woman who slept with your husband and focus your anger on just the guy. Hillary is allowed to be pissed off at all of the offenders in that.

    And frankly, let's not forget that Bill Clinton never ran for office again after this. He wasn't convicted after being impeached so he served out his term, but the end result of the Lewinsky affair did in fact end his political career. Was he successful after his presidency? Yeah... but plenty of unfaithful men are successful after their indescretions. Look at crossfire member... Newt Gingrich.

    YOu can go after Bill Clinton for his sex life all you want. He deserves it. I think you might be able to go after Hillary based on her reactions relating to Paula Jones or Juanity Brodrick. But the women who knowingly slept with Bill as consenting adults (Gennifer Flowers, Monica Lewinsky) don't have the right to expect to be treated nice by Hillary.

    Hillary bears no responsibilty to explain her choices about her marriage any more then Wendy Vitter has to answer for her choice to stay with her husband after he repeatedly used prostitution services. The ones who have to answer are the offenders... Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky... as well as David Vitter and Deborah Palfrey.

    May 8, 2014 at 1:33 pm | Reply
    • Dingleberry

      Kurt,

      The problem is Mrs. Clinton did nothing, during this scandal, to show she is the type of leader I would want for this country. Did she condemn his actions, Leave him, or come out and tell the truth NO. Both of them Mr. and Mrs. lied and fought over the meaning of is and it. Mr. Clinton should have from day one just said "Yes I had sexual relations with that woman Ms. Lewinsky" end of story. Mrs. should have left him for a period of time and they both could have had great press and they headed to marriage counseling.

      May 9, 2014 at 8:42 am | Reply
      • kurt

        The idea that your view of how to handle infidelity when you are the wronged party is the only "correct" way to handle such a thing is kind of condescending.

        Relationships are very complicated and very personal... and are really none of anyone's business besides those involved. Hillary would have been justified in kicking Bill to the curb... and also for forgiving him. There is no "correct" way to handle it other then what she (as the wronged party) feels is correct.

        Wendy Vitter chose a similar path when David Vitter was found to be repeatedly visiting a house of prostitution. She hasn't been attacked for it and she shouldn't be. I think people in Louisiana could have replaced the offender (Vitter) rather then re-elect him... but if they want to be represented by a guy who cheats on his wife and sleeps with prostitutes that's their decision. But I can't accept anyone putting ANY fault on Wendy Vitter for how she handled it. It's HER CALL.

        If Hillary had cheated on Bill... yeah, go after her. But going after her because she was cheated on? I honestly don't believe you (or anyone else) have the right to do that. That's like going after someone because they forgave a drunk driver who caused the death of a spouse or child. They are allowed to forgive (or not forgive) without you condemning them for it. They were the wronged party, not you.

        May 9, 2014 at 2:59 pm |
  8. The US Dept Of Defense

    The US DOD announces a new weapon available if hostile aliens try to take over the Earth. The DOD will allow Palin voters to "mind meld" with the aliens. The aliens' heads will immediately implode caused by the huge vacuum.

    May 8, 2014 at 12:17 pm | Reply
    • foxfree

      That was almost funny...

      May 8, 2014 at 4:18 pm | Reply
      • It's not a joke

        It would be funny, but it's TRUE. So that makes me want to cry.

        May 9, 2014 at 11:45 am |
  9. Tom1940

    If, as it has been suggested, witnesses before the Select Committee on Benghazi are "grilled" by a special counsel, instead of the usual format of about 5-minutes per Congressman, then Hillary and all the other witnesses will get to the truth of this matter. The 5-minute format works to the advantage of the "professional" politicians because their answers to a single question run on and on and on. With the Special Counsel format, a witness/questioner interface can run however long it takes, with question/answer along a particular line of inquiry for however long it takes. A definite advantage to the Committee.

    May 8, 2014 at 11:41 am | Reply
  10. Gunderson

    Sorry,
    Cat let out bag. Hillary Chief Coniviver in Chief in Clinton Administration. Re-Inventing Soviet Union so State Control everything Hillary plan. Hillary even proffered plan to take everybody's money in 401K plans, etc and give it ti Big Spenders in government. Hillary send everybody to poor house. Business see plan and move money offshore. As long as peasants keep low life's in power money stay off shore. Um? Cockroaches and Dung Beatles probably already vote, no?

    May 8, 2014 at 11:14 am | Reply
    • Put down the Everclear

      Gundy – Put down the Everclear and fix that hole in your trailer. It's going to rain.

      May 8, 2014 at 12:22 pm | Reply
      • Gunderson

        Um, Everclear or the real tom paine,
        It only rain when I wash car. My 52 Studibaker. You have car Everclear?

        May 9, 2014 at 9:40 am |
      • You're drunk again

        What's a Studibaker? Is your trailer newer than 1952?

        May 9, 2014 at 11:52 am |
  11. Every Time

    Every time is listen to Palin voters' (lack of) logic, I believe we should amend the constitution to allow higher, more respectable life forms (such as Cockroaches and Dung Beatles), to vote.

    May 8, 2014 at 9:15 am | Reply
  12. george

    Good for you Nance, Hiditard knew exactly what power she wanted and will do anything to keep it. I did not realize that van jones was part of oliars idiot crew on all the money taxpayers got swindled out of with this green job bs.

    May 8, 2014 at 7:32 am | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 91 other followers