Jump in the Crossfire by using #Crossfire
on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram.
Crossfire host Newt Gingrich along with Sally Kohn debate if recent changes to nutrition labels are an overreach of government power.
Mr. Grinch and his fellow GOP cohorts need to brush up on the basic principles of capitalism. Economists say that markets work best when consumers have ALL the information needed to make good choices. Labeling food has been one of the most succesful ways to encourage healthy eating. Without knowing what is in our food, do we simply take corporations at their word? Without regulation, we have seen time and time again that corporations put profits over health, environment and safety. I am so glad I don't live in the world of the GOP. Need we forgot the horrible pollution and death caused by unfrettered capitalism.
I guess that makes me liberal then because I want to see even more information on food labels, and I think the fact that a product contains high fructose corn syrup, trans fats, added sugar, or sodium nitrate should be in big letters on the front of the package.
All government regulations are bad. Just look at how well Ronald Reagan's deregulating the banking industry turned out. All businesses have the people's best needs at heart.
It's plain to see that the gin-grinch doesn't want people to know that soylent green is people!
So will Gingrich ban food labels on his moon colony?
I really to question crossfire hiring Newt Gingrich!
Hopefully, they're not paying him much.
I am retired farmer, now a business owner and Mr. Gingrich, you are again wrong!
Newt, Newt what are you saying? That honest labeling of foods is a liberal thing? Whoa big guy you must have just fell off the pedestal that you imagined yourself on and bumped your head obviously causing irrational thought. Personally I like to know what I'm consuming but then your so full of malarkey that you have trouble buttoning your shirt. However we do know that you should have read the labels before consuming some foods if only to check for calories.
Oh the horror. Telling Americans about the crap they are eating, that is actually killing them, is nothing short of communism. Only when America allows Corporations to poison American Citizens at will, will we all be free.
And you believe this, then you deserve the cardiac arrest that is headed your way.
Ignorance....its a conservative thing.
Gingrich believes that you have to eat the food so that you can find out what is in it.
Is that like that Idiot Pelosi, pass it to see whats in it ??? Just thank Obammy for setting the libs back decades !!!!
How is that like wanting to know what I'm feeding my family smitty?
Like he tested so many women. He didn't like any of them. Now he is testing Ms. Callista. We are yet to see if he likes it. Wonderful taste judgment he has acquired.
It's obviously part of a liberal conspiracy. There shouldn't be any government regulations like labels. You can trust corporations to always put the health and safety of the public over profits.
Newt Gingrich remains "The Symbol" of a GOP loser....
In this case, Gingrich sounds like an irrational, self-deluded Teaparty member.
There's great meaning and value in those labels for millions of Americans on special diets–for just one point. And to blame "Liberals" for that is just another in a continuing tirade from the Right against all things "Liberal" (including liberty itself).
Could not have said it better
Wait until Newt has his first cardio issue, then he will become Mr. Watchdog blaming corporations for poisoning him.
I like Crossfire. I do not like that the liberals constantly interrupt the conservatives, and SE and Newt just sit there politely. I know that they have to treat the liberals with kid gloves, as they make little sense, (and CNN wants to show liberals in the best light), but it is too obvious! Expand the show to 1 hour, put it in that useless Piers Morgans time slot, (Don't let lady liberty slap you on the fanny as you fly back to socialist Britain, Piers!)
PS, S.E. remember how sick to your stomach you felt when you were at BSNBC? But you told yourself it was worth it, cuz someday, you would get a gig where you could be yourself? Well? When are we going to get to see the S.E. Cupp that raise the intellectual level of Red Eye? Or does your contract with CNN have a "Don't make the liberal cry" clause in it, like BSNBC? And Newt, once in a while, tear Stephanie and Van a new one, they deserve it, or as Georgians are wont to say "Show them where the bear crapped in the buckwheat!"
It's an interesting view of the world you have.
Maybe your TV is backwards.
You forgot to add "And you kids stay off my lawn!".
I read food labels now and make food purchases based on them. I need a low sodium diet and the labels help me select foods compatible with that. Its shocking how many foods on the market are loaded with sodium. Perhaps Newt ignores the label (which he wouldn't if he really knew as much as he pretends to), but he shouldn't assume that everyone does. Is he also against car manufacturers being required to show mpg ratings?
It's certain the Neutered ignores the calorie counts on all labels...
I can't eat gluten. I use the labels to make sure I'm not eating something I shouldn't.
Its a pity conservatives seem to resent information being made available to them: its like they really want to be told what to do, in spite of all the prattling about "Freedom" and " Liberty". No wonder they've fallen in love with Putin.
Conservatives whine about being told what to do, but yet they are willing to follow along to whatever their lame brain leaders, and right wing media tells them. Their stupidity comes from their brain cells being ate up by hatred. So it shouldn't surprise you when stupid things come out of their mouths. I look forward to waking up reading something stupid that one of them has to say.
People are obese because they eat more calories than they burn off. That is all there is to it. You are taught in school, all about calories, good foods, etc. so you should not need color coded labels. But I digress, liberals always need a villain. That way, you, the sucker, I mean potential voter, can be a victim and feel blameless. So blame corporations, the 1%, the tea party, straight white men, and food stamps that tell you to buy Cheetos instead of cabbage. Hey liberals! Ya know what you left out? The silverware industry! Yeah! Those knives forks and spoons are making you fat too! And don't forget the evil corporations that make plates and bowls too big! God forbid you just quit stuffing your fat face and exercise a bit.
You make no sense. Is the D for dumb?
Before we had government oversight on food production, up to 25% of all food was contaminated. Teddy Roosevelt sought to change that, and to protect the people he swore an oath to protect. His progressive policies, continued later by presidents FDR, Truman, Eisenhower, and Kennedy are literally what made this country the safest and most economically powerful in the world.
If simply knowing what is in our food is somehow offensive to you, then you are truly nuts. Any idiot knows that corporations will stop at nothing to cheat us and lie to us in order to make bigger profits. It has been proven time and again that only government oversight can protect us from these monsters. That's government's most important job after all: to provide for the welfare of the people, exactly as the Constitution mandates, word for word.
In this ongoing political battle between government and corporate power, ask yourself: which group can be voted out of power if they do bad things? It's not a trick question, people. Do you want corporations to have unchecked power to abuse us? That's called corporate dictatorship, and we will be closer to it than ever before if conservatives get their way. They will destroy everything we've spent 238 years building.
If letting people know what they are buying and consuming is symbolic of liberalism, I'm all for liberalism. that has to be one of Newt's most inane comments yet.
BTW, Newt, the wife and I read the labels and choose accordingly.
New Republican talking point "food labels kill jobs"
Of course it's liberalism to cancer Gingrich. It lets people know what they are buying. I think TEA/GOP hero Reagan preached about how we need informed consumers. He only wants mis informed consumers.
Hi Mr. Gingrich, I read the food labels and rely on them, calories, carbs, ingredients and fat. I often forget to take servings into account and its would be good to highlight that. I'm not sure if the changes add any value but I really do rely on the nutrition labels. I would like added sugars broken out. I suspect you do not do the grocery shopping in your family; otherwise, you would not say that nobody reads them. Go to the grocery store and watch people!
I am not big gov, but I want my tax dollars to continue to keep our food safe. I don't yet know if I want sugar taxed or regulated. Certainly don't like regulation but I wonder how much of my insurance premiums is spent on people with nutrition problems.
Thanks for the topic.
Don't drink the Hemlock!
Another worthless comment from the reality-challanged Hector. What's the problem this time? Infuriated because the serving size on the label is telling you that your chances of being a diabetic slob are higher if you shovel the whole boxc into your face at once? I guess you yearn for the days when whale oil and cocaine were in patent medicines.
Gingrich is the reason I cannot abide Crossfire, and refuse to watch it as long as he is present!
Yep, we turn the channel or hit the mute button the instant he appears (on any program).
Oh I'm sure you both do. Liberals can't stand hearing opposing points of view. As a matter of fact, to liberals fascism is perfectly okay so long as they are in charge.
Actually, I welcome opposing points of view when they are supported by rational thought and verifiable facts. When they are just so much hot air or contain labels and terms (like fascism ) that I ignore as it's obvious that the person has no clue as to what they are referring to.
fascism |ˈfa sh ˌizəm| (also Fascism)
an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.
The term Fascism was first used of the totalitarian right-wing nationalist regime of Mussolini in Italy (1922–43), and the regimes of the Nazis in Germany and Franco in Spain were also fascist. Fascism tends to include a belief in the supremacy of one national or ethnic group (like tea party patriots or white christians).
The hypocrisy of Gingrich is just too nauseating, and he has little common sense. That's my reason. What's your reasons for defending this hypocrite? Just curious, but I really cannot imagine many reasons. Is it that silly grin?
I always turn off the TEA/GOP clowns when they turn on the rant recorder. I don't need to hear the same, tired old gas baggery more than once.
What Michelle Obama is doing is a great thing for all of us as consumers, individuals and parents. It doesn't matter who she is in our government but at the time she's the "First Lady" and stepping up for us. This is a large issue and needs to be addressed and resolved. We have every right to know exactly what goes into our foods and beverages that we consume. As of now we are all being mislead in several areas. You buy something and no clue that some products are really two servings and no clue how much sugar are in products et. Sugar is the largest leading cause to tooth problems and especially in our children.
Who goes out and buys a pack of Ramen Noodle soup and cuts it in 1/2? According to the package it's supposed to feed 2 people and it barely feeds one. So now you have double the salt in the product if you eat the entire package and the salt content is huge. Sodium is a large factor that leads to high blood pressure.
If the food and beverage industries don't like telling consumers the 100% truth then maybe this will lead them into cutting down in salt, sugar ect.. to make the food and beverages more healthy products to sell to the consumers.
I totally commend the "First Lady" for what she is doing. There are very few people beside the wealthy who can just go out and buy anything they want and let alone don't even have to look at the prices. Most people have to stick to a budget and a grocery list, so what we can only afford to buy we all deserve to eat and drink healthy foods. Not to buy stuff that's going to lead us all into bad health. The fruits and vegetables that are fresh and so over priced that it forces people with tight budgets to buy frozen or canned which has little to no nutrients at all. What she is doing is necessary and it's time for the government to step in because nothing has been done about it. We all deserve better as consumers and let alone we are taxed on our food as well.
Is Newt a joke? Nobody reads the nutrition lables!? My body has a difficult time processing cholesterol and my life depends on knowing how much trans fats and saturated fats and cholesterol are in the food I eat. Others are diabetic and some have food alergies and some want to know how many calories they take in. These lables are life savers for many of us. The only reason Republicans hate the truth in labeling is so they can protect the big food companies profits! To hell with the health of the people!
Michael H.: Was that first question rhetorical? If not, the answer is 'yes'.
Yes, the government can try to lead people in the right direction – but it usually does not work. Don't fool yourself Ms. Obama – I'm a teaching assistant in a Las Vegas middle school. When small bags of fruit (apples, pears, grapes) are distributed as a side item to their hot lunch of pizza at lunchtime, easily 80% of the fruit bags are thrown in the trash. I mean everyday! Whatever the "good food" item is, it is not going to be eaten by 80% of the students. So why serve it?
Um, for the 20% who eat them maybe? (assuming that your statistic is accurate)
By your observation, we've got 20%, 1 in 5, parents so good at raising their young children to eat healthy that those children will do so even without parental supervision. Thus making those 1 in 5 children statistically more likely to lead healthier, longer, more productive lives. And you want to take that from them. Thanks a lot. 1 in 5 parents must think you're great.
When the kids are getting too many BAD calories and eat only what "Tastes good to them" (the bad calorie foods), surprise, they'll throw 80% of the good stuff away.
You and parents have to do their part, do they not? Why are letting them waste so much nutritious food????
It takes a village. You look at it with a defeatist attitude.
As a liberal, i'm excited and pleased the gingrich recognises liberal leadership in public health and safety.
I am getting to the point of overload as to what Government has to do with our lives....., This is NOT the America I was born into..! Government makes their share of mistakes..I mean big ones., They say I am sorry and off we go to wonderland, but we as Tax paying Americans can't choose what we want for breakfast..I think they have so many roles handed down to us, it is like we have no brains or a thought process, and when we exercise that right..we are wrong. Washington has gotten way too big !
Telling people what is in food is not dictating what you can eat. It also is not controlling every aspect of your life. Your post makes me believe you don't have a functional brain. Get your head out of Blimpbaugh's backside. You may learn(on no that dirty word again) something.
We still get to choose what we eat. All this is doing is put information on the foods we consume so we can make educated choices. A free market doesn't work with an uninformed populace. You really need to calm down.
Really? You're complaining about allowing people to know what's in the food they eat? No one is forcing you to read it but for some people it may be crucial to their health. What's the big deal? The manufacturer's know what's in it. They print on every square of the package anyway.
Where yo paid for your post?
Doubling the font size of calories and adding an "added sugar" entry took you to the point of overload? Have you considered medication?
How did you feel about trans-vaginal scans? Were you ok with that? If your answer is yes, you've just proven what a tool you are.
I'm not sure how even conservatives can be upset with regulations that simply require businesses to be honest with their customers.
Requiring businesses to tell people what's in the food they're selling... how on earth can you think that's some sort of overreach?
Are you honestly saying companies should be free to lie to us or hide the harmful things they put in the food they sell us?
The answer would be a resounding " YES", because the virtuous businessman should not be burdened with honesty when there is money to be made.
Notify me of new comments via email.
Author, documentary filmmaker, historian, Speaker of the House (1995-1999), and 2012 Republican presidential candidate
Fmr. Obama Deputy Campaign Mgr. and W.H. Sr. Adviser, founder of Precision Strategies, fmr. Sr. Adviser to Maj. Leader Reid and Sen. Kennedy
Conservative columnist for New York Daily News, contributing editor at Townhall Magazine, commentator and author
Former Special Adviser for Green Jobs under President Obama, co-founder of Rebuild the Dream, author and attorney
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
Join 94 other followers