Join the debate

Jump in the Crossfire by using #Crossfire on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram.

Jump in the Crossfire by using #Crossfire
on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram.

Tonight in the Crossfire: Lieberman and Santorum on Syria
September 10th, 2013
04:09 PM ET

Tonight in the Crossfire: Lieberman and Santorum on Syria

President Obama says that a plan suggested by Russia to have Syria hand over its chemical arsenal to international control could avert American strikes "if it's real." As Obama prepares to address the nation, should he follow Russia's lead on Syria, or should he keep threatening a military strike.

Former US Senators Joe Lieberman (I-CT) and Rick Santorum (R-PA) join hosts Van Jones and S.E. Cupp in the Crossfire to debate the options.

We want you to weigh in: Should the U.S. trust Russia’s offer to rid Syria of chemical weapons? Vote below or tweet your response using #CrossfireReturns. You can also vote by commenting on our Facebook post.

You can watch the results in real-time below or on our Poptip results page.

During the show, join the conversation with #CrossfireReturns on Twitter and Facebook or participate and follow along with our live blog.


Join the conversation on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram with #CrossfireReturns.

RELATED:
Syrian crisis: Keeping up with key developments
A stunning turn that could silence Syria war drums

soundoff (3 Responses)
  1. paul thompson

    Who does the American public /govt trust ,not the UN, Russians ,China ,Iraq,Iran,Syria,or any one who disagrees with your foreign policies.how many wars have you been involved in since WWII.i watched the debate between Lieberman/Santorum and frankly if its not the USA way then we will go to war to save face and show that we are a world power .just like in Iran we don't care if were right as we can /shall bully the world to get what we want ,we lie to get our own way and think other nations look up to us ,you are a country obsessed with war and the rest of the world has tired of your self interests under the guise of homeland security.

    September 10, 2013 at 7:35 pm | Reply
  2. hamptonhistory

    This would be a debate: Santorum vs. Amy Goodman, or maybe the Socialist Workers party vs. Tea Party Express. What you have offered us instead is the same pro-establishment PROPAGANDA-style fake debate that Jon Stewart killed off a while back. I guess Jeff Zucker is bringing the same old lazy propaganda, shame.

    September 10, 2013 at 6:12 pm | Reply
  3. hamptonhistory

    The two biggest pro-war pigs you can find, at a time when the country is 70% against any action? You might as well stop pretending to be impartial!

    September 10, 2013 at 6:05 pm | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 95 other followers